Articles
| Open Access | Data‑Centric Governance and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Foundational Framework for Transparent, Equitable, and Compliant Welfare Systems
Abstract
The integration of data‑centric artificial intelligence (AI) into governance mechanisms signifies a transformative epoch in how welfare systems are designed, implemented, and regulated. This paper develops a comprehensive framework that explicates the theoretical underpinnings, practical mechanisms, ethical implications, and governance models that promote transparency, equity, bias mitigation, and policy compliance within welfare management. Against the backdrop of a growing scholarly consensus on the imperative of data quality, integrity, and governance as central to AI effectiveness (Priyadarshi et al., 2026), this research synthesizes cross‑disciplinary perspectives from data science, public policy, AI ethics, and systems engineering. We interrogate the technological, organizational, and socio‑political dimensions of data‑centric AI, situating welfare governance in an ecosystem where data governance functions as both a technical and normative anchor for accountability. Through analytical integration of scholarly debates, this study constructs an interpretive model that aligns data‑centric paradigm principles with the unique demands of public welfare systems. Findings reveal critical intersections between data governance and AI trustworthiness, emphasizing the necessity of robust data curation, participatory policy frameworks, continual evaluation mechanisms, and stakeholder alignment. The discussion foregrounds complex debates around fairness, bias control, regulatory compliance, and transparency, offering a distilled yet expansive discourse that bridges theory and practice. The paper concludes with an actionable research agenda that underscores emergent questions for future inquiry.
Keywords
data‑centric artificial intelligence, governance, transparency, bias mitigation
References
Angelakis, A., & Rass, A. (2024). A data‑centric approach to class‑specific bias in image data augmentation. arXiv.
Hamid, O. H. (2023). Data‑centric and model‑centric AI: Twin drivers of compact and robust Industry 4.0 solutions. Applied Sciences, 13, 2753.
Ilager, S., De Maio, V., Lujic, I., & Brandic, I. (2023). Data‑centric Edge‑AI: A symbolic representation use case. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Communications, 301–308.
Kumar, S., Sharma, R., Singh, V., Tiwari, S., Singh, S. K., & Datta, S. (2023). Potential impact of data‑centric AI on society. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 42, 98–107.
Priyadarshi Uddandarao, D., Sravanthi Valiveti, S. S., Varanasi, S. R., Rahman, H., & Chakraborty, P. (2026). Data‑centric governance models using trustworthy AI: Strengthening transparency, bias control, and policy compliance in welfare management. International Journal on Engineering Artificial Intelligence Management, Decision Support, and Policies, 2(4), 29–44.
Whang, S. E., Roh, Y., Song, H., & Lee, J. G. (2023). Data collection and quality challenges in deep learning: A data‑centric AI perspective. VLDB Journal, 32, 791–813.
Zha, D., Bhat, Z. P., Lai, K. H., Yang, F., Jiang, Z., Zhong, S., & Hu, X. (2023). Data‑centric artificial intelligence: A survey. arXiv.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Andersson (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.