Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmm-05-02-06
Biliary Reflux Following Conventional Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic mini gastric bypass is widely performed for the treatment of morbid obesity due to its metabolic efficacy and technical simplicity. However, concerns remain regarding postoperative bile reflux associated with its loop configuration.
Objective: To evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of bile reflux following conventional laparoscopic mini gastric bypass in a single-center cohort.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 consecutive patients who underwent con-ventional mini gastric bypass between 2021 and 2023. Patients were stratified according to pre-operative gastroesophageal reflux status. Early postoperative outcomes were assessed at 30 days, including endoscopic visualization of bile in the gastric pouch and reflux-related symptoms. Mid-term outcomes at 12 months included excess weight loss (%EWL), reflux dynamics, and quality-of-life evaluation.
Results: At 30 days, bile was visualized endoscopically in 90.6% of patients with preoperative re-flux and in 47.2% of those without prior reflux (p < 0.001). De novo reflux symptoms developed in 27.8% of previously asymptomatic patients. Most patients in both subgroups achieved ≥50% EWL at 12 months, with greater weight loss seen in those without preoperative reflux. Complete resolution of reflux symptoms occurred in 18.8% of patients with baseline reflux, whereas persis-tent or partially regressed symptoms remained common. Quality-of-life improvement was observed overall but was lower in patients with ongoing reflux manifestations.
Conclusion: Conventional mini gastric bypass ensures effective weight loss but is associated with a high incidence of early bile reflux, particularly in patients with preoperative gastroesophageal re-flux disease, and not negligible even in initially asymptomatic individuals.
Keywords
Mini gastric bypass, bile reflux, gastroesophageal reflux
References
Zhang F., Xu B., Mao Z. One-anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for patients with BMI >50 kg/m² or >60 kg/m²: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Asian Journal of Surgery. – 2023. – Т. 46, № 8. – С. 3168–3170.
Uhe I., Douissard J., Podetta M. et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrecto-my, or one-anastomosis gastric bypass? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials // Obesity (Silver Spring). – 2022. – Т. 30, № 3. – С. 614–627.
Ward Z.J., Bleich S.N., Long M.W. et al. Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex // Health Affairs. – 2021. – Vol. 40, № 6. – P. 903–910.
Sista F., Clementi M., Rivkine E. et al. Gastric bypass after multiple restrictive pro-cedures: Roux-en-Y or one anastomosis? A retrospective multicentric study // European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. – 2022. – Т. 26, № 6. – С. 2075–2084.
Rutledge R., Walsh T.R. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients // Obes Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 15(9). – P. 1304–1308.
Puzziferri N., Roshek T.B. III, Mayo H.G. et al. Long-term follow-up after bariatric surgery: a systematic review // JAMA. – 2014. – Vol. 312(9). – P. 934–942.
Musella M., Manno E., Iossa A. Position Statement of IFSO: Statement on OAGB-MGB // Obesity Surgery. – 2022. – Т. 32, № 2. – С. 376–384.
Moosavi D., Taherzadeh M., Mokhber S. et al. Presentation of portomesenteric thrombosis after one-anastomosis gastric bypass: case report // International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. – 2023. – Т. 111. – С. 108900.
Li X., Hu X., Fu C. et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: a meta-analysis and systematic review // Obesity Sur-gery. – 2023. – Т. 33, № 2. – С. 611–622.
Ospanov O., Yeleuov G., Fursov A. et al. A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial // Trials. – 2022. – Т. 23, № 1. – С. 264.
Nevo N., Evola G., Sagnelli C. et al. Severe ketoacidosis after one anastomosis gas-tric bypass surgery // American Journal of Case Reports. – 2023. – Т. 24. – С. e939581.
O'Kane M., Parretti H.M., Pinkney J. et al. British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society Guidelines on perioperative and postoperative biochemical monitoring and micronutrient replacement for patients undergoing bariatric surgery – 2020 update // Obesity Reviews. – 2020. – Т. 21, № 11. – С. e13087.
Kermansaravi M., Shahmiri S.S., Davarpanah Jazi A.H. et al. One anastomo-sis/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) as revisional surgery following primary restrictive bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Obesity Surgery. – 2021. – Т. 31, № 1. – С. 370–383.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Matkuliev U.I., Abduganiev J.A., Fayzullaev E.R., Kuchkarov A.A., Ubaydullaev Z.B., Urinov O.N., Usmonov B.B. (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.