Large‑scale language models (LLMs) built on the Transformer architecture have demonstrated extraordinary capabilities but impose heavy computational and latency burdens, especially during inference. This paper investigates a dual‑pronged approach to mitigating such burdens: first, firmware‑level optimization techniques that reduce latency and enhance inference throughput, and second, integrating architectural modifications—specifically sparse attention mechanisms—to reduce redundant computation without degrading model performance. We develop a conceptual framework that unifies hardware‑level and algorithmic‑level improvements; then we simulate (in thought‑experiment form) how a Transformer‑derived LLM would perform under such optimizations, drawing on empirical evidence from prior work on attention sparsity and head pruning. We find that by pruning redundant attention heads (as in head‑importance analyses) and replacing conventional softmax attention with sparse activation mechanisms, it is theoretically possible to greatly reduce both memory–compute load and inference latency while preserving semantic fidelity and downstream task performance. We discuss implications for deploying LLMs in resource‑constrained environments (e.g., edge devices), potential trade‑offs (coverage, hallucination risk), and directions for future empirical validation, especially in the context of firmware‑level optimizations for inference engines.

Sparse attention, multi‑head pruning, LLM inference optimization, firmware‑level efficiency

Reducing Latency and Enhancing Accuracy in LLM Inference through Firmware‑Level Optimization. (2025). International Journal of Signal Processing, Embedded Systems and VLSI Design, 5(02), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijvsli-05-02-02

Michel, P.; Levy, O.; Neubig, G. (2019). Are Sixteen Heads Really Better Than One? In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10650

Jain, S.; Wallace, B.C. (2019). Attention Is Not Explanation. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10186

Wiegreffe, S.; Pinter, Y. (2019). Attention is not not Explanation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 8–14 December 2019. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04626

Takase, S.; Okazaki, N. (2020). Sparse Attention with Linear Units. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Online, 5–10 July 2020. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07012

Clark, K.; Khandelwal, U.; Levy, O.; Manning, C.D. (2019). What Does BERT Look at? An Analysis of BERT’s Attention. In Proceedings of the BlackboxNLP Workshop at ACL, Florence, Italy, 1 August 2019. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04341

Tonmoy, S. et al. (2024). A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01313

Ferrag, M. A.; Debbah, M.; Al‑Hawawreh, M. (2023). Generative AI for cyber threat‑hunting in 6G‑enabled IoT networks. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM 23rd International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing Workshops (CCGridW), pp. 16–25.

Sarker, I. H. et al. (2024). Multiaspect rule‑based AI: Methods, taxonomy, challenges and directions toward automation, intelligence and transparent cybersecurity modeling for critical infrastructures. Internet of Things.

Yao, Y. et al. (2024). A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. HighConfidence Comput.

Yan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, K. (2024). Depending on yourself when you should: Mentoring LLM with RL agents to become the master in cybersecurity games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17674

Sladić, M. et al. (2023). LLM in the shell: Generative honeypots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00155

Tann, W. et al. (2023). Using large language models for cybersecurity capture‑the‑flag challenges and certification questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10443.