The accelerating convergence of artificial intelligence, advanced information retrieval systems, and accounting process transformation has fundamentally reshaped the architecture of modern financial management. Among the most critical organizational processes affected by this convergence is the financial close, a recurring and high-stakes procedure that determines the accuracy, reliability, and strategic usability of financial information. At the same time, the expansion of digital transactions and complex global reporting environments has amplified the prevalence and sophistication of financial fraud, necessitating more robust detection mechanisms. This research article develops an integrated, theoretically grounded framework that examines how AI-assisted retrieval architectures, large language model augmentation, and anomaly detection techniques collectively transform financial close processes and fraud detection capabilities.

Drawing strictly upon the provided scholarly and professional references, this study synthesizes foundational accounting theory with contemporary machine learning literature to explore the evolution from spreadsheet-centric accounting toward intelligent, automated, and explainable financial systems. The article positions the financial close not merely as an operational routine but as a socio-technical system in which data integrity, governance, interpretability, and human judgment intersect. By incorporating retrieval-augmented language models, contrastive text embeddings, and open-source search infrastructures, organizations can significantly enhance data reconciliation, narrative financial reporting, and cross-GAAP alignment while maintaining auditability and compliance.

In parallel, the article undertakes an extensive theoretical exploration of fraud and anomaly detection methodologies, including statistical models, distance-based outlier detection, density-based approaches, isolation techniques, and hybrid supervised–unsupervised learning systems. These methods are analyzed in the context of accounting data characteristics such as high dimensionality, class imbalance, temporal drift, and regulatory constraints. The discussion emphasizes that fraud detection is not a purely technical challenge but an organizational capability shaped by accounting standards, internal controls, and decision-making cultures.

The findings of this study suggest that the true transformative potential of artificial intelligence in accounting does not lie in automation alone, but in the intelligent orchestration of retrieval, interpretation, and anomaly detection within standardized financial close processes. The article contributes to academic literature by bridging accounting theory and machine learning research, offering a holistic conceptual model that explains how AI-enhanced financial ecosystems can improve accuracy, transparency, and trust while mitigating systemic risk. Practical implications for educators, practitioners, and policymakers are discussed, along with limitations and future research directions in the evolving domain of intelligent accounting systems.

Financial close, artificial intelligence in accounting, anomaly detection, fraud detection

Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Islam, M. R. (2016). A survey of anomaly detection techniques in financial domain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 55, 278–288.

Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–249.

Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000). LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, 93–104.

Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2012). Isolation-based anomaly detection. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 6(3), 1–39.

Campos, G. O., Zimek, A., Sander, J., & Campello, R. J. G. B. (2016). On the evaluation of unsupervised outlier detection in high-dimensional numerical data. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 30(2), 374–409.

Carcillo, F., Le Borgne, Y. A., Caelen, O., Kessaci, Y., & Oblé, F. (2019). Combining unsupervised and supervised learning in credit card fraud detection. Information Sciences, 497, 82–92.

Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58.

European Journal of Accounting and Finance. (2024). Application of AI in routine accounting tasks, 8(1), 55–72.

Kale, A. (2025). AI-assisted multi-GAAP reconciliation frameworks: A paradigm shift in global financial practices. Emerging Frontiers Library for The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(07), 67–77.

Kelso, K. (2011). Building blocks of a successful financial close process. Journal of Accountancy, 212(6), 18.

Knorr, E. M., Ng, R. T., & Tucakov, V. (2000). Distance-based outliers: Algorithms and applications. VLDB Journal, 8(3–4), 237–253.

Liu, J., Jin, J., Wang, Z., Cheng, J., Dou, Z., & Wen, J. R. (2023). RETA-LLM: A retrieval-augmented large language model toolkit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05212.

Mulyadi, A., & Davies, D. (2025). Business school teaching case: Taking accountancy from spreadsheets to AI. Financial Times.

OpenSearch. (2023). OpenSearch. Accessed November 16, 2023.

Stojanović, B., Božić, J., Hofer-Schmitz, K., Nahrgang, K., & Weber, A. (2021). Follow the trail: Machine learning for fraud detection in fintech. Sensors, 21(1), 1–20.

Wang, L., Yang, N., Huang, X., Jiao, B., Yang, L., Jiang, D., Majumder, R., & Wei, F. (2022). Text embeddings by weakly-supervised contrastive pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03533.

Wild, J., Shaw, K., & Chiappetta, B. (2022). Financial and managerial accounting. McGraw Hill.